Material Costing & LKAS 2 Inventories
Inventory types, the cost of inventory and NRV (LKAS 2), the purchase function (centralised vs decentralised, purchase procedure, material cost), storing materials (stock levels, EOQ), and pricing issues with FIFO and weighted average — with every lecture example solved.
▶Lecture videos
Click any timestamp — here or inside the notes — to jump the video to that moment. Your position is remembered.
Inventory Costing
Lecture on inventory and material costing.
00:48Learning outcomes: what inventories are and why systems matter03:13Key features of an inventory system05:01Why hold inventory: independence of operations06:34Flexibility in production scheduling07:46Economic purchase orders and discounts09:50Inventory costs: ordering cost11:09Set-up costs (e.g. switching car models)12:41Stock-out costs (e.g. a phone launch)14:03Objectives of stock control17:04Stock levels19:34Reorder level formula20:53Minimum stock level (buffer stock)24:01Maximum stock level25:42Worked example: stock levels27:14EOQ: minimising total cost28:31Holding cost per unit per year29:58FIFO valuation31:37Example: FIFO and weighted average cost (WAC)41:16FIFO in inflation: higher profit and stock value42:39WAC smooths out price changes44:21Summary: FIFO vs WAC1Inventory & LKAS 2
Inventory is the raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods that are the part of a business's assets ready, or that will be ready, for sale.
LKAS 2 objective: prescribe the accounting for inventories:
- determining cost
- recognising the expense, including any write-down to NRV
- the cost formulas used
Inventories are stated at the LOWER of cost and net realisable value (NRV).
What goes into the cost of inventory
| Include | Exclude |
|---|---|
| Purchase costs: price + non-refundable taxes, transport and handling, net of trade discounts and subsidies | Abnormal waste |
| Conversion costs: direct labour + fixed and variable production overheads | Storage costs |
| Other costs to bring inventory to its present location and condition | Administrative overheads not related to production |
| Selling costs | |
| Foreign-exchange differences on recent foreign-currency purchases | |
| Interest on deferred-settlement purchases |
Purchase-cost layout:
| Rs | |
|---|---|
| Purchase price | xxxx |
| Less: trade discounts | (xxx) |
| Less: subsidies | (xxx) |
| Carriage inwards | xxxx |
| Direct taxes | xxxx |
| Non-refundable taxes | xxxx |
| Other direct costs | xxxx |
| Total purchase cost | xxxx |
Net realisable value
- Write-downs to NRV are an expense in the period they happen. Reversals are recognised in the income statement when they happen.
- NRV can be compared item by item (the item method) or by groups of similar items (the batch method).
- Cost formulas for interchangeable items: FIFO or weighted average (LIFO is not allowed).
- Expense recognition: when inventory is sold, its carrying amount becomes cost of goods sold. Write-downs and losses are expensed when they occur.
| Item | Cost | NRV | Value used |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1,000 | 1,300 | 1,000 |
| B | 800 | 650 | 650 |
| C | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| Item-by-item total | 2,150 |
Comparing the totals instead (cost 2,300 vs NRV 2,450) would give 2,300. That hides B's loss, which is why the item method is preferred.
2Function 1: managing purchases
Centralised vs decentralised buying
| Centralised buying | Decentralised buying | |
|---|---|---|
| Advantages | Consistent buying policy · better control · expert buying staff · avoids excess stock | Lower transport cost · rejections, shortages and excess receipts settled quickly · local purchase benefits (low or seasonal prices) |
| Disadvantages | Less flexible · high initial cost · high transport cost | High stock-holding cost |
The purchase procedure
- Purchase requisition (when?)
- Determine quantity (how much?)
- Select supplier (where?)
- Purchase order & follow-up
- Receive & inspect (GRN)
- Check invoice & pass for payment
| Step | Details |
|---|---|
| 1. Purchase requisition (PR) | Request to buy, usually in triplicate: to purchasing, to production control, and kept by the initiating department |
| 2. Quantity | In line with production and sales plans. Optimum quantity, no overstocking (EOQ) |
| 3. Supplier | Inquiries and tenders or quotations → analyse tenders → select the best source |
| 4. Purchase order | A large firm may make 5 copies: supplier, receiving department, accounts, the requisitioning department, and one kept by purchasing |
| 5. Receive and inspect | Unload, unpack, mark; check quality and quantity; move into the factory. Prepare the goods received note (GRN), the basis of entries in the stores ledger |
| 6. Invoice | Check against the PO and GRN, then pass for payment |
Material cost
Invoice price + freight + excise duty + non-returnable containers (as LKAS 2's purchase cost).
- Cash discount is a financial item, not deducted from material cost.
- Returnable containers: only the net cost (charge − credit on return) is included.
- Quotation: 2,000 units @ Rs 5.00; 4,000 @ Rs 4.75; 6,000 @ Rs 4.00
- Trade discount 25%; cash discount 5% within 10 days
- Freight Rs 200 per order
- Containers Rs 0.50 each, one per 100 units, credit Rs 0.30 each if returned within two months
| Rs | |
|---|---|
| 6,000 × Rs 4.00 | 24,000 |
| Less: trade discount 25% | (6,000) |
| 18,000 | |
| Freight | 200 |
| Containers: 60 × 0.50 = 30, less credit 60 × 0.30 = 18 → net | 12 |
| Total material cost | 18,212 |
| Cost per unit = 18,212 ÷ 6,000 | ≈ Rs 3.035 |
The cash discount is ignored: it's a financing decision, not a cost of the material.
3Function 2: storing materials & stock levels
Why efficient storing?
- keep stores in proper custody
- protect them from theft, deterioration, evaporation, pilferage
- maintain a smooth, regular flow to production
Store locations: centralised, decentralised, or a combination.
| Centralised stores: advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Better layout, less equipment, better supervision, economy in cost, better stock forecasting | High transport cost, greater fire risk, delays to production |
Stock control levels
| Level | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Re-order level (ROL) | Max consumption × max lead time (or min stock + avg consumption × avg lead time) | When the storekeeper raises a purchase requisition |
| Maximum stock level | ROL + ROQ − (min consumption × min lead time) | Stock shouldn't rise above this (avoids blocking capital) |
| Minimum stock level (safety or buffer stock) | ROL − (avg consumption × avg lead time) | Stock shouldn't fall below this |
| Average stock level | (Max + Min) ÷ 2, or Min + ½ ROQ |
- ROQ = 36,000 units
- Lead time 2–4 months (average 3)
- Max consumption 9,000 per month; normal consumption 6,000 per month
- Assume minimum consumption = 2 × 6,000 − 9,000 = 3,000, since normal is the average of max and min
| Level | Working | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Re-order level | 9,000 × 4 | 36,000 |
| Minimum level | 36,000 − (6,000 × 3) | 18,000 |
| Maximum level | 36,000 + 36,000 − (3,000 × 2) | 66,000 |
| Average level | (66,000 + 18,000) ÷ 2 | 42,000 (or 18,000 + ½ × 36,000 = 36,000) |
Economic order quantity (EOQ)
D = annual demand · Co = cost of placing one order · Ch = holding cost per unit per year
EOQ assumptions:
- perfectly forecastable, even demand
- constant lead time
- constant material price
- constant holding cost per unit
- Monthly usage 250, so D = 3,000 a year
- Co = Rs 30
- Unit cost Rs 5, holding cost 10%, so Ch = Rs 0.50
EOQ = √(2 × 3,000 × 30 ÷ 0.5) = √360,000 = 600 units
4Function 3: pricing material issues — FIFO & weighted average
| Method | Idea | Effect when prices rise |
|---|---|---|
| FIFO (first in, first out) | Issues are priced at the oldest batches first | Issues at older (lower) prices, so closing stock is at the latest (higher) prices and profit is higher |
| Weighted average cost (WAC) | After each receipt, compute average = total value ÷ total units; issue at that average | Smooths price changes |
- 1 Jan: balance 200 @ Rs 500
- 10 Jan: purchased 300 @ Rs 600
- 15 Jan: issued 250
- 20 Jan: purchased 100 @ Rs 650
- 24 Jan: issued 175
FIFO
| Date | Issue | Issue value | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Jan | 200 @ 500 + 50 @ 600 | 130,000 | 250 @ 600 = 150,000 |
| 20 Jan | (receipt) | 250 @ 600 + 100 @ 650 = 215,000 | |
| 24 Jan | 175 @ 600 | 105,000 | 75 @ 600 + 100 @ 650 = 110,000 |
Weighted average (perpetual)
| Date | Working | Issue value | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Jan | (100,000 + 180,000) ÷ 500 = Rs 560 | 500 @ 560 = 280,000 | |
| 15 Jan | 250 @ 560 | 140,000 | 250 @ 560 = 140,000 |
| 20 Jan | (140,000 + 65,000) ÷ 350 = Rs 585.71 | 350 = 205,000 | |
| 24 Jan | 175 @ 585.71 | 102,500 | 175 = 102,500 |
One per line: R qty price for a receipt, I qty for an issue. The first line can be the opening balance as a receipt.
Expect:
- LKAS 2: lower of cost and NRV; what's included in and excluded from cost; FIFO and WAC allowed
- Material cost calculations (trade discount, freight, net container cost; ignore cash discount)
- Centralised vs decentralised buying and stores
- The purchase procedure and its documents (PR, PO, GRN)
- ROL, maximum, minimum and average levels
- EOQ with its assumptions
- The stores ledger using FIFO and WAC
5Practice questions (course paper)
| Rs. | |
|---|---|
| Purchase price 300,000 − trade discount 10% | 270,000 |
| Carriage inwards | 50,000 |
| Import tax | 20,000 |
| Clearing charges | 15,000 |
| Non-recoverable VAT: 60% × 10,000 | 6,000 |
| Cost | 361,000 |
| Item | Cost | Selling price | Selling cost | NRV | Value at (lower of cost and NRV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100 | 120 | 30 | 90 | 90 |
| B | 120 | 150 | 20 | 130 | 120 |
| C | 300 | 305 | 15 | 290 | 290 |
| Batch | Item | Cost | NRV | Units | Item method (lower × units) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soap | Lux | 35 | 30 | 200 | 6,000 |
| Soap | Rani | 40 | 41 | 150 | 6,000 |
| Toothpaste | Signal | 120 | 110 | 100 | 11,000 |
| Toothpaste | Supiriwiki | 100 | 95 | 60 | 5,700 |
| 28,700 |
Batch method:
- Soap: cost 13,000 vs NRV 12,150 → 12,150
- Toothpaste: cost 18,000 vs NRV 16,700 → 16,700
- Total 28,850
The table columns are jumbled in the PDF; this is the reading that fits them.
| Q | Answer | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | (d) all of the above | Maximum, minimum and re-order levels all guide requisitioning |
| 5 | (b) re-order level | Safety stock depends on consumption, lead time and stock-out cost, not on the ROL |
| 6 | (c) EOQ | It balances ordering and holding costs |
| 7 | (b) 2,100 | ROL = max usage × max lead time = 700 × 3 |
| 8 | (a) LIFO | Issues are charged at the latest (higher) prices. LKAS 2 doesn't allow LIFO in financial statements, but it's the textbook answer |
Opening 545 @ 35. Receipts: 444 @ 37.50 (Jan) · 500 @ 40 (Feb) · 750 @ 42 (Mar). Issues: 400 · 610 · 450.
| Issue | FIFO | WAC (rate) |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 400 | 400 @ 35 = 14,000 | @ 36.12 = 14,448.94 |
| Feb 610 | 145 @ 35 + 444 @ 37.50 + 21 @ 40 = 22,565 | @ 37.90 = 23,120.66 |
| Mar 450 | 450 @ 40 = 18,000 | @ 40.40 = 18,181.39 |
| Closing 779 units | 29 @ 40 + 750 @ 42 = 32,660 | 31,474.01 |
If a physical count differs from the card, adjust the card to the count, and write off the shortage at the issue rate as a material loss.
Q10 (Swarnahansa):
- EOQ = √(2 × 600 × 80 / 0.60) = 400 units
- Orders a year = 600 / 400 = 1.5
- Minimum yearly cost = 1.5 × 80 + (400 / 2) × 0.60 = 120 + 120 = Rs. 240
- Supply period = 12 / 1.5 = 8 months
Q11 (Sachin Ltd): annual usage 1,200; carrying cost = 25% × 4 quarters × 40 = Rs. 40 per unit per year.
- EOQ = √(2 × 1,200 × 600 / 40) ≈ 190 units
- Orders ≈ 6.3 a year
Q12 (product X): annual usage 60 × 52 = 3,120.
| Measure | Formula | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Re-order quantity (EOQ) | √(2 × 3,120 × 120 / 12) | ≈ 250 |
| Re-order level | max usage × max lead time = 90 × 6 | 540 |
| Minimum level | ROL − normal usage × normal lead time = 540 − 60 × 5 | 240 |
| Maximum level | ROL + ROQ − min usage × min lead time = 540 + 250 − 30 × 4 | 670 |
| Average level | (min + max) / 2 | 455 |
Q13 to Q15: annual usage 250 × 12 = 3,000.
- Q13: EOQ = √(2 × 3,000 × 30 / 0.5) = 600 (c)
- Q14: orders = 3,000 / 600 = 5 (a)
- Q15: time between orders = 12 / 5 = 2.4 months (c)
6Quick revision sheet
| Concept | Remember it as |
|---|---|
| Inventory | Raw materials, WIP, finished goods |
| LKAS 2 rule | Lower of cost and NRV |
| Cost | Purchase + conversion + other costs (location and condition) |
| Excluded | Abnormal waste, storage, admin, selling, FX, deferred interest |
| NRV | Selling price − completion costs − selling costs |
| Formulas | FIFO or weighted average (no LIFO) |
| Buying | Centralised (control, expertise) vs decentralised (local, quick) |
| Documents | Purchase requisition → purchase order → GRN → invoice |
| Material cost | Price − trade discount + freight + net containers (6,000 units = 18,212) |
| ROL | Max use × max lead time (36,000) |
| Min | ROL − avg use × avg lead time (18,000) |
| Max | ROL + ROQ − min use × min lead time |
| EOQ | √(2DCo/Ch) = 600 |
| FIFO / WAC example | Issues 130,000 + 105,000 vs 140,000 + 102,500 |
?Self-check quiz
11 questions on this week. Answer them all, then press Check my answers. Your best and latest scores are saved and shown on the subject page.