Standard Costing & Variance Analysis
Standard cost vs budgeted cost, setting material, labour and overhead standards, the four types of standards, the standard cost card (Rs 134 example), the variance tree with every formula (material, labour, variable and fixed overhead, sales), a full worked variance example, and the advantages and limitations.
▶Lecture videos
Click any timestamp — here or inside the notes — to jump the video to that moment. Your position is remembered.
Standard Costing
What standards are and how they're set, the types of standards, the standard cost card, and the advantages and limitations. The variance formulas are in the PDF.
00:02Introduction01:17Why standard costing: controlling cost (the carpenter's chair, 15,000 vs 18,000)03:08What standard costing is04:21What a standard cost is05:31Uses: control, stock valuation, pricing06:25Standard cost vs budgeted cost07:51Example: 10,000 units × Rs 3 = Rs 30,000 budget08:51Setting standards: historical records vs engineering studies10:48Direct material standards: bill of materials and purchasing13:37Direct labour standards14:12Overhead standards: short run vs long run15:51Four types of performance standards17:15Ideal standards18:29Attainable standards19:15Current standards19:45Basic standards20:20Standard cost card21:01Example: product A = Rs 134 per unit22:24Advantages of standard costing25:17Limitations of standard costing1Standard cost & standard costing
- Standard cost: a predetermined (planned) estimated unit cost of a product, component or service, used for stock valuation and control 04:21. It's what a unit should cost under efficient operating conditions.
- Standard costing: a control technique that compares standard costs and revenues with actual results to obtain variances, which are used to stimulate improved performance 03:08.
A carpenter targets Rs 15,000 per chair, but the actual cost is Rs 18,000. That's a Rs 3,000 adverse variance. He investigates why and controls that cost next time. This is the core idea of standard costing.
Standard costing involves:
- Set standards
- Ascertain actual results
- Compare → variances
- Investigate & take action
Uses of standard costs:
- cost control
- performance evaluation
- stock valuation
- setting selling prices 05:31
Standard vs budget
| Standard | Budget | |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Per unit of product or activity | Total activity or operation |
| Example 07:51 | Rs 3 per unit | 10,000 units × 3 = Rs 30,000 |
Similarities:
- both are forecasts about the future
- both are control tools
They're interrelated: budget = standard × budgeted activity.
2Setting standards
Two approaches 08:51:
- Historical records: use past experience of materials, labour and overhead per unit. It's simple.
- Engineering studies: a technical study of the input–output relationship. It's more complex but more precise.
| Component | Quantity standard | Price or rate standard |
|---|---|---|
| Direct material | Bill of materials (BOM) per product, allowing for unavoidable waste (avoidable waste is not allowed) 11:44 | Purchasing department: contracts, supplier discussions, forecast price movements |
| Direct labour | Standard hours for an average worker to do the job | Contractual wage rate 13:37 |
| Overheads | Standard hours (absorption base) | Standard overhead absorption rate. Fixed overheads don't vary in the short run, but are absorbed per unit for financial reporting and inventory valuation 14:55 |
3Types of standards
| Type | Based on | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Ideal | Perfect conditions: no waste, spoilage, inefficiency, idle time or breakdowns 17:15 | Unattainable, so it demotivates |
| Attainable | Allows for normal waste and inefficiency; realistic but challenging 18:29 | Best for motivation ✓ |
| Current | Current conditions, including current waste and inefficiency 19:15 | Doesn't try to improve efficiency |
| Basic | Old standards, never changed 19:45 | Least useful; mainly for showing long-term trends |
4Standard cost card
The standard cost card shows the full details of the standard cost of each product, one card per product. It's confidential: for top management decision-making only 20:20.
| Element | Standard quantity | Standard price or rate | Rs per unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct material | 2 kg | Rs 10 per kg | 20 |
| Direct labour | 3 hours | Rs 24 per hour | 72 |
| Variable overhead | 3 hours | Rs 8 per hour | 24 |
| Fixed overhead | 3 hours | Rs 6 per hour | 18 |
| Standard cost per unit | 134 |
5The variance tree
A = adverse (actual cost > standard, or actual revenue < standard): reduces profit.
F = favourable: increases profit.
6Variance formulas
Price variance = (AQ × AP) − (AQ × SP) = Actual cost − Standard cost of actual quantity
Usage variance = (AQ − SQ) × SP (SQ = standard quantity for the actual output)
Rate variance = (AH × AR) − (AH × SR)
Efficiency variance = (AH − SH) × SR (SH = standard hours for actual output)
Expenditure variance = Actual VOH − (AH × standard VOH rate)
Efficiency variance = (AH − SH) × standard VOH rate
Total variance = Actual FOH − Absorbed FOH (actual output × FOAR)
Expenditure variance = Actual FOH − Budgeted FOH
Volume variance = Absorbed − Budgeted = (Actual output − Budgeted output) × FOAR per unit
Selling price variance = (Actual price − Standard price) × Actual units sold
Sales volume variance = (Actual units − Budgeted units) × standard profit per unit (absorption costing) or × standard contribution per unit (marginal costing)
For costs, actual > standard is adverse. For revenue and volume, actual > standard is favourable. The two sub-variances always add up to the total.
Data:
- Budget: 1,000 units; budgeted fixed overhead Rs 18,000 (FOAR Rs 18 per unit); standard price Rs 180 (standard profit 180 − 134 = Rs 46).
- Actual:
- produced and sold 1,100 units at Rs 175
- materials 2,300 kg costing Rs 24,150
- labour 3,200 hours costing Rs 78,400
- overheads: VOH Rs 26,000; FOH Rs 19,500
Standards for the actual output:
- SQ = 1,100 × 2 = 2,200 kg
- SH = 1,100 × 3 = 3,300 hours
| Variance | Working | Rs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DM price | 24,150 − 2,300 × 10 | 1,150 | A |
| DM usage | (2,300 − 2,200) × 10 | 1,000 | A |
| DL rate | 78,400 − 3,200 × 24 | 1,600 | A |
| DL efficiency | (3,200 − 3,300) × 24 | 2,400 | F |
| VOH expenditure | 26,000 − 3,200 × 8 | 400 | A |
| VOH efficiency | (3,200 − 3,300) × 8 | 800 | F |
| FOH expenditure | 19,500 − 18,000 | 1,500 | A |
| FOH volume | (1,100 − 1,000) × 18 | 1,800 | F |
| FOH total (check) | 19,500 − 1,100 × 18 = 19,500 − 19,800 | 300 | F ✓ |
| Selling price | (175 − 180) × 1,100 | 5,500 | A |
| Sales volume | (1,100 − 1,000) × 46 | 4,600 | F |
Interpretation:
- Workers were efficient: fewer hours than standard.
- But they were paid a higher rate, and materials cost more and more were used. Did cheaper, poor-quality material slow anything? Here it didn't, but investigate the interdependence.
- Selling more units at a lower price gave a net Rs 900 adverse sales effect.
Standards (from the cost card). Edit any value.
Actuals
7Advantages & limitations
| Advantages 22:24 | Limitations 25:17 |
|---|---|
| Predicts future costs for decision-making | Too much emphasis on direct labour; modern production is capital-intensive |
| Gives employees a target, which motivates them | Needs repetitive operations and homogeneous output, so it's unsuited to non-standardised or customised production |
| Evaluates managerial performance | Hard to apply in service organisations |
| Helps set budgets (standard × activity) | Built for stable environments; standards go out of date as prices change |
| Acts as a control device: management by exception | Assumes performance to standard is acceptable, which conflicts with continuous improvement |
| Simplifies costing for profit measurement and inventory valuation | Assigning responsibility for variances is difficult (they're interdependent) |
| Reporting delay: variances arrive late | |
| Behavioural issues: unattainable standards demotivate; blame culture |
Expect:
- Define standard cost and standard costing.
- Standard vs budget.
- How standards are set, for material, labour and overhead.
- The four types of standards, and why attainable is preferred.
- Prepare a standard cost card.
- Calculate and interpret variances. Always label A or F, and use SQ and SH for actual output.
- Advantages and limitations.
8Practice questions (course paper)
Standard quantity: limestone 11 kg × 10,000 = 110 tons; sand 26 kg × 10,000 = 260 tons.
| Variance | Limestone | Sand | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price: (SP − AP) × AQ | (70 − 75) × 100 = 500 A | (14 − 10) × 250 = 1,000 F | 500 F |
| Usage: (SQ − AQ) × SP | (110 − 100) × 70 = 700 F | (260 − 250) × 14 = 140 F | 840 F |
| Total: SQ·SP − AQ·AP | 7,700 − 7,500 = 200 F | 3,640 − 2,500 = 1,140 F | 1,340 F |
Actual hours: 0.50 × 10,000 = 5,000. Standard hours: 0.55 × 10,000 = 5,500.
- Rate: (SR − AR) × AH = (10 − 12) × 5,000 = 10,000 A
- Efficiency: (SH − AH) × SR = (5,500 − 5,000) × 10 = 5,000 F
- Total: SH × SR − AH × AR = 55,000 − 60,000 = 5,000 A
Standard hours for actual output:
- Plus: 4,500 × 2 = 9,000 direct labour hours @ 10
- Gold: 5,200 × 1 = 5,200 machine hours @ 12
Expenditure: (actual hours × standard rate) − actual cost = (10,000 × 10 + 5,000 × 12) − 175,000 = 160,000 − 175,000 = 15,000 A
Efficiency:
- Plus: (9,000 − 10,000) × 10 = 10,000 A
- Gold: (5,200 − 5,000) × 12 = 2,400 F
- Net 7,600 A
Total: standard cost 152,400 − actual 175,000 = 22,600 A (= 15,000 A + 7,600 A ✓)
- Absorbed: 275,000 × 2,000 = Rs. 550 Mn
- Budgeted: 250,000 × 2,000 = Rs. 500 Mn
- Actual: Rs. 600 Mn
| Variance | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 550 − 600 | 50 Mn A |
| Expenditure | 500 − 600 | 100 Mn A |
| Volume | 550 − 500 | 50 Mn F |
- Sales price: (actual price − standard price) × actual quantity = (380 − 400) × 200 = 4,000 A
- Sales volume (margin): (actual quantity − budgeted quantity) × standard margin = (200 − 210) × (400 − 250) = 1,500 A
9Quick revision sheet
| Concept | Remember it as |
|---|---|
| Standard cost | Predetermined unit cost under efficient conditions |
| Standard costing | Compare standard with actual → variances → action |
| Standard vs budget | Per unit vs total activity (Rs 3 × 10,000 = 30,000) |
| Setting standards | Historical records · engineering studies; BOM, purchasing, contract wage rate |
| Types | Ideal (perfect, demotivating) · attainable (best) · current (no improvement) · basic (old) |
| Cost card example | 20 + 72 + 24 + 18 = 134 |
| DM price / usage | AQ(AP − SP) / SP(AQ − SQ) |
| DL rate / efficiency | AH(AR − SR) / SR(AH − SH) |
| VOH | Expenditure: actual − AH × rate; efficiency: (AH − SH) × rate |
| FOH | Expenditure: actual − budget; volume: (actual − budget units) × FOAR |
| Sales | Price: (AP − SP) × actual units; volume: (actual − budget units) × standard profit or contribution |
| A vs F | Higher cost or lower revenue = adverse |
| Limitations | Labour focus · homogeneous output only · services · stable environment · no continuous improvement · responsibility · delay · behaviour |
?Self-check quiz
12 questions on this week. Answer them all, then press Check my answers. Your best and latest scores are saved and shown on the subject page.